{"id":961,"date":"2011-01-05T00:01:18","date_gmt":"2011-01-05T05:01:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/?p=961"},"modified":"2011-01-05T09:31:17","modified_gmt":"2011-01-05T14:31:17","slug":"more-than-meets-the-eye","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/2011\/01\/05\/more-than-meets-the-eye\/","title":{"rendered":"More than meets the eye"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Back in August<\/a>, while at the International Congress of Dipterology in Costa Rica, I reported on a new species identification technique using some pretty sophisticated technology (i.e. a black piece of paper). The study was published today in PNAS<\/a> (open access), so I thought I’d revisit it in more detail as our cool science of the week!<\/p>\n

\n

\"Shevtsova<\/a>

Fig. G from Shevtsova et al., 2011<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

Although most people who have observed insects in the wild have likely seen flashes of colour as wings flick, it’s been assumed that those colours are random, much like those on the oily slicks in parking lots or around blown bubbles. Combined with the habit of most entomologists to use a white stage while examining their organisms, and you have the perfect storm for fortuitous discovery! After examining numerous Eulophidae wasps, the authors realized these colourful patterns were actually species specific (and in some species sexually dimorphic) and even lead to the discovery of a “cryptic species” complex. The authors then branched out and examined whether these Wing Interference Patterns (WIPs) could be found in other clear winged insects, and lo and behold, the same trends were found in Diptera!<\/p>\n

\"Shevtsova<\/a>

Shevtsova et al., 2011, Diptera WIP Samples from 16 different fly families (left column = Nematocera, centre column = Lower Brachycera, right column = Acalyptratae)<\/p><\/div>\n

The colours are a result of light being scattered by different thicknesses of chitin, and thanks to some fancy physics and computer algorithms, the thickness of the wing can be accurately measured just based on the observed colour. The potential for species recognition (both by eye and possibly through automated programs), functional morphology & evolution (the colours reveal atrophied wing veins), behavioural ecology (do insects use these patterns for intra- and interspecific communication in the dark jungle?), and developmental biology (the authors tie wing vein and pattern development back to early gene activity) are almost limitless! I expect that plenty of entomologists will be trying this inexpensive technique out over the coming months. I’m going to give it a try with my micropezids, and I’ll provide a sneak peek in the next week or two!<\/p>\n

The paper is well worth a read (no worries, it’s only 6 pages), and every paragraph seems to hold another neat factoid concerning these beautiful patterns!<\/p>\n

Bonus Quote on “Cryptic Species”:<\/p>\n

\u201ccryptic species\u201d (which often means \u201cnot readily distinguishable by a large diurnal mammal with a microscope\u201d)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Sweetly blunt.<\/p>\n

Reference:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ekaterina Shevtsova, Christer Hansson, Daniel H. Janzen, and Jostein Kj\u00e6randsen. Stable structural color patterns displayed on transparent insect wings<\/strong> PNAS<\/abbr> published ahead of print January 3, 2011, doi:10.1073\/pnas.1017393108 <\/cite>http:\/\/www.pnas.org\/content\/early\/2010\/12\/27\/1017393108.abstract<\/a><\/p>\n

H\/T to Miles Zhang for passing along the article.
\n<\/address>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Back in August, while at the International Congress of Dipterology in Costa Rica, I reported on a new species identification technique using some pretty sophisticated technology (i.e. a black piece of paper). The study was published today in PNAS (open access), so I thought I’d revisit it in more detail as our cool science of […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[75,130,4],"tags":[207,185,598,35,206,205],"class_list":["post-961","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-biology","category-cool-science","category-entomology","tag-awesome-quote","tag-big-science","tag-diptera","tag-hymenoptera","tag-morphology","tag-physics","category-75-id","category-130-id","category-4-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/961","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=961"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/961\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":970,"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/961\/revisions\/970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=961"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=961"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=961"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}