{"id":2245,"date":"2012-06-20T00:39:10","date_gmt":"2012-06-20T04:39:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/?p=2245"},"modified":"2012-06-27T09:00:35","modified_gmt":"2012-06-27T13:00:35","slug":"remember-publish-first-publicize-second","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/2012\/06\/20\/remember-publish-first-publicize-second\/","title":{"rendered":"Remember: Publish First, Publicize Second"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Well this is fun1<\/sup>: an entomologist in New Zealand has decided to name a recently discovered moth species after the movie Avatar<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"Arctesthes<\/a>

Arctesthes avatar courtesy of the Forest & Bird press release<\/p><\/div>\n

The moth in question was recently discovered on a parcel of land in central New Zealand which is currently slated to become an opencast coal mine. In an effort to prevent the area from being destroyed, Forest & Bird<\/a> (a conservation group in New Zealand) staged a BioBlitz to draw attention to the unique flora & fauna found there. After realizing that they had discovered an undescribed species at the BioBlitz, entomologist Brian Patrick<\/a> and his son decided to hold a contest, encouraging the public to come up with a potential name for the new species to further draw attention to the cause.<\/p>\n

After nearly 100 names were submitted, it was announced June 19, 2012 that the winning name will be\u00a0Arctesthes avatar.<\/em>\u00a0From the press release<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Brian said the Avatar moth was a clear winner. \u201cIt was by far the best one. It\u2019s a novel name and the movie is about a mining company that threatens to devastate a human-like species that\u2019s living in harmony with nature. It\u2019s just a really good analogy.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

As we’ve seen with other species names\u00a0referencing\u00a0pop-culture icons<\/a>, the New Zealand media<\/a> picked up the story and ran with it<\/a>, publishing the story, the name, and a photo of the moth. Normally this would be great exposure for the researchers (and biodiversity science in general), getting some press for a new species in a location that’s not that far from populated areas.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately for the researchers, they may have put the cart before the horse on this one by publicizing their discovery before publishing it themselves.<\/p>\n

Unlike other sciences, where you may be able to get away with leaking your results a little ahead of your publication2<\/sup>, when it comes to naming species it’s incredibly important to wait until you’ve actually published. The reason being that if the new species name appears in a publication that has multiple, simultaneously printed copies (like the NZ Herald\/Greymouth Star newspapers<\/a>3<\/sup>) with even a semblance of a description (like “striped moth”, which has been used repeatedly with this story) and\/or a photograph (see above), whoever wrote that article becomes the authority behind the name! Nevermind that Brian Patrick is the taxonomic expert, collected the specimen, recognized it as being unique, discovered where it belonged in the tree of life and, in this instance, acquired DNA evidence. All of that will go unrecognized4<\/sup> and the first journalist who wrote up the story off the press release will go down as the one who formally described the species!<\/p>\n

Simply put, instead of being recorded as Arctesthes avatar<\/em>\u00a0Patrick & Patrick 2012, the species will be known as Arctesthes avatar<\/em>\u00a0RandomJournalist 2012. Oops!<\/p>\n

The fact that new species descriptions needn’t be published in a peer-reviewed journal may come as a surprise, but I think it’s an effort to keep taxonomy an accessible science for anyone, anywhere. It’s clear that some funny things can happen when there are few restrictions on where a species can be described, and as the Code of Zoological Nomenclature<\/a> moves into the digital age with the next edition, many taxonomists are hoping that registration services like ZooBank<\/a> will play a big role in new species descriptions and validation in the future. Until the new “Code” is ratified however, unfortunate events like what happened here with\u00a0Arctesthes avatar<\/em>\u00a0are possible.<\/p>\n

So remember kids, when you go to describe a new species, publish<\/strong> first, publicize<\/strong> second!<\/p>\n

UPDATE<\/strong> 27\/06\/2012: As Kai pointed out in the comments below, the authors have escaped this embarrassing scenario because none of the media stories will likely include enough information to form a proper type designation.<\/p>\n

——————–<\/p>\n

1- My definition of fun and that of the entomologist involved are probably different here…<\/p>\n

2- Although I would assume this is frowned upon as well.<\/p>\n

3- Thanks to David Winter of the Atavism<\/a> for help tracking these sources down.<\/p>\n

4- They’ll still publish their work, but it won’t actually be a new species description anymore.<\/p>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Well this is fun1: an entomologist in New Zealand has decided to name a recently discovered moth species after the movie Avatar. The moth in question was recently discovered on a parcel of land in central New Zealand which is currently slated to become an opencast coal mine. In an effort to prevent the area […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[176,10,379],"tags":[407,65,211,597],"class_list":["post-2245","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-publication","category-taxonomy","category-taxonomy-in-the-news","tag-iczn","tag-lepidoptera","tag-nomenclature","tag-taxonomy","category-176-id","category-10-id","category-379-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2245","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2245"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2245\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2258,"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2245\/revisions\/2258"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2245"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2245"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.biodiversityinfocus.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2245"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}